Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Sep 20 10_49_23 CDT 2000
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JLP:ddj
Docket No: 3190-99
24 August 1999

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1780 PERS 604 of 29 July 1999, a copy of which
is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the appli~antto
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE

MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

1780
PERS— 604

29 JUL 1999

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOZCB)

Sub~ ~

Ref:

(a) NPC memo 5420 PERS—OOZCB of 8 Jul 99
(b) OPNAVINST 1520.24B
(c) Title 38, United States Code, Chapter 30

ICO SHójj~~~

1.

The following is provided in response to reference (a)

a.

The Navy’s Scholarship Program only applies to officers

desiring to pursue education be ond the baccalaureate level as
desc1ribed in reference (b) .
Scholarship Program.

~ is not eligible for the

b.

The program I

hilt may have been referring to is the

NCF Program is offered as an
Navy College Fund (NCF) Program.
enlistment incentive only at the time of enlistment to members
who meet the basic eligibility criteria outlined in reference
(c) .
not all applicants are offered the NCF Program.

It is offered only at the discretion of the classifier and

c.

The DD Form 1966/1 is the only official d

nt used to

identify enlistment guarantees.
ment contract shows he was guaranteed “5 Year Obligation (5Y/O)
Hospital Corpsman (HM) “A” School” only and not NCF Program as
initialed by SHSA Pratt.
Pratt’s request as no counseling inconsistencies were noted.

Recommend the Board disapprove SHSA

A review o

enlist-

_____

2.
Program
benefit is $528.00 per month for 36 months.
entitlement is adjusted yearly based on the Consumer Price Index.

elected to enroll in the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB)

The present educational assistance

August 1998.

The monthly

PERS-604’s point of contact is Mr. Linden Butler who c~n be

3.
reached at (DSN) 882—4246 or (C) 901—874—4246.

Captain, “~.S. Navy
Director, Navy Drug & Alcohol,
Fitness, Education, and
Partnerships Division (PERS—60)



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03190-99

    Original file (03190-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The program-may have been referring to is the Navy College Fund (NCF) Program.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03055-01

    Original file (03055-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP: ddj Docket No: 31 July 2001 3055-01 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Recommend the Board deny EM3 m$request to add Navy College Fund (NCF) Program guarantee to his master as well as the Enlistment Bonus (EB) NCF Program, record. is an enlistment incentive program...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03895-00

    Original file (03895-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2000. Recommend the Board deny STS3 equest to add Reference Navy College Fund (NCF) Program enlistment guarantee to his master record. enlistment bonus are not eligible for the NCF Program.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02527-01

    Original file (02527-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 July 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02011-01

    Original file (02011-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. HN Sartor's annex to his DD Form 4 indicates he was guaranteed "Hospital Corpsman (Five Year Obligation) Program," but not NCF Program.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05093-01

    Original file (05093-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or In this regard, it is important iil_justice. offered only at the discretion of the classifier, not the field If NCF Program funding and quotas are exhausted at recruiter. he is not entitled to receive NCF Program e annex to his DD Form 4 a Since the documents c initiale evident A review of 2. elected to enroll in Montgomery GI...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06324-02

    Original file (06324-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 Pers 604 of 19 September is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Review of 's record revealed he signed an "Because I will not be entering into another Administrative Remarks Page (NAVPERS which states qualifying Navy College Fund rating, I understand that I am...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07343-00

    Original file (07343-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. (DD Form 1966) informing him what enlistment guarantees he would receive and again, He also reviewed and initialed his Enlistment Contract ,made to him other than those listed on this NCF Program was not listed. lected to enroll in the MGIB Program on is entitled to receive 36 months of benefits.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02211-01

    Original file (02211-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 PERS-604 of 30 May 2001, a copy of which is attached. Recommend the Board deny s request to add Navy an enlistment option to NCF Program is a guarantee offered only at College Fund (NCF) Program guarantee as his master record. he is not entitled to receive NCF .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05352-01

    Original file (05352-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 10 October 200 1 5352-01 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title Ilnitecl States Code, section 10 of the 1552. The Enlistment Document (DD Form 4) is the official document used to identify those servicemembers who receive the NCF Program as part of their enlistment guarantee. he was never eligible...